# SEO in Japan: How Search Works and How to Rank ({{current-or-next-year}} Guide)

> How search works in Japan for a European company: the Google and Yahoo! Japan reality, multi-script keyword research, what Japan SEO costs, AI Overviews in Japanese search, and how to hire a Japan SEO agency without speaking Japanese.

- **Source:** https://www.silkdrive.com/insights/seo-japan-search
- **Author:** Patric Sawada
- **Published:** 2026-07-08  ·  **Updated:** 2026-08-23
- **Category:** Digital Marketing
- **Topics:** Japan SEO, SEO Japan, Yahoo Japan, Japanese search, international SEO, cross-cultural marketing, ai overviews japan, answer engine optimisation, bing japan, japan search share

## Summary

- **In Japan you are mostly optimising for Google.** Google leads Japanese search, and Yahoo! Japan's web search has run on Google's search technology since 2010, so ranking well on Google covers the large majority of Japanese search. Watch Bing though; its measured share has surged on desktop
- **Japanese-language SEO is localisation, not translation.** Japanese has no spaces between words, mixes kanji, hiragana, katakana, and romaji, and the same product can be searched in three or four different spellings, each with its own volume and intent
- **Search is mobile-first.** Smartphone ownership sits at 91.8% of households and Japan has roughly 107 million internet users, so mobile performance is a baseline requirement
- **AI Overviews are live in Japanese search.** Japan was in the first group of countries to get them in August 2024, so structuring pages to be cited, with clear definitions, sourced numbers, and FAQ blocks, now belongs in the plan
- **Budget realistically.** Vendor quotes we have seen for proper Japanese site localisation run EUR 10,000 to 30,000, and Clutch-listed Tokyo agencies start projects between $1,000 and $5,000. Plan on six to twelve months before organic work pays back
- **Most Japan SEO agencies publish no pricing.** When you shortlist, ask who actually writes the Japanese, how they research keywords across scripts, and where their links come from
- **Ranking no longer implies traffic.** Across 30 of our own top non-branded queries measured in August 2026, an AI Overview held absolute position 1 on 89% of them, and our citation rate inside those Overviews was 28%. Every cited query placed us in the live top 8, so citation currently requires ranking rather than replacing it

Most European companies arrive in Japan braced for a completely alien search market: a different dominant engine, a different rulebook, a whole separate SEO programme to run. The reality is simpler than the folklore, and the single most useful thing to know up front saves a lot of wasted effort.

This guide covers how search actually works in Japan: which engines matter, why the mobile-first point is non-negotiable, how Japanese-language SEO differs from translating your home pages, how to run keyword research across Japan's four scripts, what the work costs, what AI Overviews change, and how to hire help without speaking Japanese.

## The One Thing to Get Right: You Are Mostly Optimising for Google

Here is the headline. In Japan, you are mostly optimising for Google.

Two facts combine to make that true. First, Google is the dominant search engine in Japan. Second, and less well known outside the market, Yahoo! Japan's web search has run on Google's search technology since 2010, an arrangement that has been long-standing. Yahoo! Japan announced back in 2010 that it would adopt Google's search technology to power its web search, and that relationship has held for years.

The practical consequence is that ranking well on Google covers the large majority of Japanese search, including much of what a user sees when they search through Yahoo! Japan. You do not need two parallel organic SEO programmes. You need one strong Google SEO programme, executed properly for the Japanese language and the Japanese user, plus a clear-eyed view of where Yahoo! Japan's portal still adds reach.

That reframes the whole project. The hard part of Japan SEO is doing Google SEO well in Japanese, not chasing an exotic second engine.

## The Search Market: Google, Bing, Yahoo! Japan

With the headline established, the rest of the market falls into place.

**Google leads, but watch the Bing number.** According to StatCounter, which tracks search-engine market share by measuring page views across a large sample of sites, the June 2026 readings for Japan, checked against the live dataset on 8 July 2026, were[^statcounter-jp]:

| Engine | Share |
|---|---|
| Google | 59.0% |
| Bing | 33.1% |
| Yahoo! Japan | 6.2% |
| Everything else | under 1% each |

Most published guidance still says Google holds 80% or more of Japanese search. That was true reasonably recently, which is why the claim persists, and it is why you should check the date on any share figure before you build a plan on it. That Bing figure deserves a caveat and a comment. The caveat: StatCounter's Japan readings have swung hard over the past two years, so check the live figures before you quote them in a plan. The comment: Bing's measured strength is concentrated on desktop, which in Japan means office computers, and it is driven substantially by default placement rather than active preference, so the intent mix behind it differs from Google's. Segment your reporting by engine rather than averaging two different markets into one number. If you sell to Japanese businesses, Bing is no longer a rounding error, and the good news is that solid Google-oriented SEO carries over to Bing with little extra work. The full engine-by-engine picture, including the long tail of Japanese portals, is in our breakdown of [search engines in Japan](/insights/search-engines-in-japan).

**Yahoo! Japan still matters, but as a portal.** It is one of the most-visited properties in Japan. It sits inside LY Corporation alongside the LINE messaging app, and together they reach a large share of the population, with Yahoo! Japan drawing tens of millions of monthly users in its own right. As a search engine its share is now modest; as a property it is substantial, so plan for it as media rather than as ranking.

Its strength is in verticals: news, shopping, finance, and a dense portal home page that still shapes a lot of Japanese browsing. Its audience skews older and more female than Google's. So even though its search results are Google-powered, Yahoo! Japan is worth attention for its portal placements and, as we will see, its ad network, when your target audience skews older.

For a deeper per-segment decision on where Yahoo! Japan earns budget, we keep a separate breakdown in our [Yahoo! Japan vs Google decision matrix](/insights/yahoo-japan-vs-google-eu-brands).

## Search Is Mobile-First

Whatever you do for Japanese search, do it mobile-first.

![A commuter in Tokyo running a search on her smartphone, a reminder that SEO in Japan is mobile-first](/images/insights/japan-mobile-search.webp)

Smartphone ownership reached 91.8% of Japanese households in 2025, and Japan had roughly 107 million internet users at the end of 2025, close to 87% of the population. Those two numbers set the baseline: the Japanese user is on a phone, and there are a lot of them.

For SEO, that means mobile performance and mobile-friendly pages are non-negotiable, not a later refinement. Page speed on a phone, tap-friendly layouts, and content that reads well on a small screen are entry conditions for competing in Japanese search, not extras. If your Japanese pages are a desktop-first afterthought, you are losing before the ranking factors even come into play.

The desktop caveat from the search-market section still applies in B2B. Japanese office workers search from company desktops during the day, which is exactly where Bing's share concentrates. Consumer brand? Think phone. Enterprise software? Think phone and office desktop both.

## Japanese-Language SEO, Done Right

This is where most European SEO programmes stumble, and it is the difference between a page that ranks and a page that never gets found.

Japanese does not work like European languages, and that has direct consequences for search:

- **There are no spaces between words.** Japanese text runs continuously, so word boundaries and how search engines and users parse a query behave differently from spaced languages.
- **It mixes four scripts.** A single sentence can combine kanji (logographic characters), hiragana and katakana (two syllabaries), and romaji (Latin letters). The same concept can be written in more than one script, and users may search for it in any of them.
- **Users search in ways machine translation misses.** The phrasing a Japanese person actually types into a search box is often not the literal translation of your English or Dutch keyword. Real query patterns, abbreviations, and loanword conventions frequently diverge from what a translation tool produces.

The lesson is blunt: do not machine-translate your home-market pages and expect them to rank. Translation converts words. Localisation rebuilds the page around how Japanese users actually search and read. That means native keyword research to find the terms people really use, and native copy written for a Japanese reader rather than translated at them.

This is the same principle we cover more broadly in our guide to [international SEO strategy](/insights/international-seo-strategy): start from search intent in the target market, use native speakers, and study local SERPs to see what actually ranks. Japan is simply one of the clearest cases for it, because the script and query differences are so pronounced.

For the wider cultural fit around messaging and creative that surrounds this work, see our [cross-cultural marketing guide](/insights/cross-cultural-marketing-guide).

## A Keyword Research Workflow for Four Scripts

Saying "do native keyword research" is easy. Here is what the work actually looks like when one word can be spelled four ways.

Take a concrete example. Sushi can be written 寿司 (kanji), すし (hiragana), or スシ (katakana). All three are the same word to a human. To a search engine, and in the keyword databases, each spelling is a separate query with its own volume and often its own intent. Brand names add another layer. McDonald's is マクドナルド in katakana, but almost nobody types that. Kanto users abbreviate it to マック and Kansai users to マクド, a regional split famous enough in Japan that the company itself has played with it in campaigns. If your keyword list only contains the "correct" dictionary form, you are invisible for the variants people actually type.

A workflow that handles this:

1. **Start from Japanese seeds, not translated ones.** Have a native speaker brainstorm how a Japanese buyer would describe the problem and the product. Pull more seeds from the Japanese sites of your local competitors and from Japanese industry media. A translated version of your Dutch or German keyword list is the wrong starting point, because it inherits your home market's phrasing.
2. **Expand every seed across scripts and abbreviations.** For each seed, list the kanji, hiragana, katakana, and romaji forms that exist, plus common contractions and loanword spellings. Not every word has all four forms, but loanwords and brand terms usually have at least two live variants.
3. **Pull volumes per variant.** Google Keyword Planner, Ahrefs, Semrush, and DataForSEO all support Japanese-language, Japan-location queries. Check each spelling separately. The volume differences between variants are frequently large, and the biggest variant is not always the dictionary form.
4. **Read the live Japanese SERP for each candidate.** Script choice can shift intent. A katakana loanword often signals a consumer shopping context, while a formal kanji compound can pull corporate and informational results. Ten minutes looking at what Google actually ranks for each variant tells you which page type you need.
5. **Assign one primary variant per page.** Pick the variant whose volume and intent match the page, and let the other spellings appear naturally in the body copy. Do not build near-duplicate pages per spelling; Google handles Japanese tokenisation well and cross-matches variants to a reasonable degree, but it still rewards the page that commits to the query users actually type.
6. **Mind the long tail.** Japanese searchers write long, descriptive queries, and question searches often end in とは ("what is"). These long-tail patterns are where a challenger site wins first, before it can compete on head terms.

One warning from experience: the tools alone will mislead you on register. Japanese has levels of politeness and formality that change which word a business buyer versus a consumer would ever type. Every keyword list needs a native reviewer before it becomes a content plan.

## Technical Notes for Japanese-Language Pages

Most technical SEO is identical worldwide, so this section is short. Four Japan-specific points are worth building in from day one.

- **Keep URL slugs in the Latin alphabet.** Japanese characters in URLs get percent-encoded when copied, turning a clean link into a long string of symbols that looks broken when shared in chat or email. Latin slugs sidestep it.
- **Write shorter titles than you would in English.** Japanese SERP snippets truncate at roughly 30 full-width characters on desktop, and less on mobile. Front-load the keyword and the value.
- **Declare the language and pick fonts deliberately.** Set the lang attribute to ja on Japanese pages, wire hreflang between your language versions, and test how your fonts render kanji at small mobile sizes. Because Japanese has no spaces, awkward mid-phrase line breaks are common; check headings by hand.
- **You do not need a .jp domain to rank.** A Japanese subdirectory on your existing domain works and inherits your site's authority. A .jp domain is sometimes recommended as a trust signal for Japanese buyers, and for conversion that argument has merit, but treat it as a branding decision rather than a ranking requirement.

## AI Overviews Have Arrived in Japanese Search

Japanese search results now regularly include an AI-generated answer at the top of the page. Google announced AI Overviews for Japan in August 2024, in the first group of six countries to get them outside the United States. Any Japan entry plan written today should treat the AI answer block as a standing feature of the results page.

Two consequences follow for a European company.

First, informational queries will increasingly resolve on the results page itself, with your potential visitor reading a summary instead of clicking. That raises the bar for informational content: it earns its place by being cited in the summary, or by answering something too specific for the summary to cover.

Second, citability is now an optimisation target of its own. AI Overviews quote and link named sources. Pages built from clear definitional passages, question-shaped headings, sourced statistics, and FAQ blocks give the systems something quotable to lift. This applies double in Japan, where the domestic SEO industry has already productised the work; Japanese agencies openly sell it as LLMO or AIO services alongside classic SEO. The optimisation-for-AI-answers discipline (sometimes called AEO or GEO) is the same one we apply to our own pages: state the definition plainly in the first sentences under a heading, attach a number and a named source, and keep a structured FAQ.

The same structural work also feeds ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other assistants that Japanese professionals increasingly consult before a purchase. One programme, two payoffs.

## Ranking No Longer Implies Traffic

The AI answer layer has a measurable cost, and we can show it on our own property rather than assert it.

In August 2026 we took the 30 highest-impression non-branded queries from our own Search Console data and checked each against a live results page. An AI Overview held absolute position 1 on **89% of them** (25 of the 28 queries that returned clean results). Our own citation rate inside those Overviews was **28%** (7 of 25). The decisive case is a query where we rank organic position 2 and are quoted as one of only four sources inside the Overview: over 695 impressions in 28 days it produced **zero clicks**. That is not a page-title problem. The answer is delivered before anyone reaches a result, and the user does not travel.

The same panel says something more useful about how the two jobs relate. Every query where we were cited placed us in the live top 8: positions 2, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8 and 8. Of the queries where we were not cited, only two placed us in the top 20 at all, at positions 16 and 17. On that evidence, being quoted by an answer engine is not a route that bypasses ranking. It is a second gate behind the first one. You still have to rank, and then you have to be worth quoting.

Being worth quoting has a shape. Answer engines assemble from passages that state something specific, attribute it, and date it. A page that generalises pleasantly across 3,000 words offers nothing extractable. A page that says "Dentsu's 5 March 2026 report puts internet advertising at 4,045.9 billion yen, 50.2% of total Japanese advertising expenditure" offers a sentence that can be lifted whole. Write for the lift. The wider treatment for European B2B is in [AEO and GEO for European B2B](/insights/aeo-geo-european-b2b).

### What This Does to Your Measurement

The classic position-based click-through benchmarks, the ones putting position one around 28%, describe a results page that no longer exists. Post-2025 research is directionally consistent and numerically scattered: Ahrefs puts the top-position reduction at roughly 58% where an Overview is present, Pew Research Center measured a traditional-result click on about 8% of visits with an AI summary against 15% without, Seer Interactive reports informational-query declines of roughly half to two thirds with a partial rebound in early 2026, and Amsive found an average decline near 15.5% across a large keyword set, steeper on non-branded terms. There is no single replacement table.

The workable method is to segment your own query-page pairs by whether an Overview is present and compute observed click-through rate within each segment. Industry figures are a sanity check, not a plan. One trap to know before you try it: Search Console anonymises low-volume queries, and this is not a row limit you can raise. On our own property, 92% of clicks and 75% of impressions were invisible at query level, by API or by export. Query-level totals are a biased sample and must never be presented as site totals.

In practice that means grading informational content on citation rather than clicks, keeping commercial terms graded on clicks because buyers still travel, and fixing ranking where you are absent, because citation does not happen from position 30.

## Paid Search Fits Alongside

Organic is not the whole search picture, and in Japan paid search earns its place.

Listing (search) ads are among the most effective online ad formats in Japan, so search advertising belongs in the plan alongside your organic work, not as an afterthought. It is also the biggest single component of Japanese digital media spend: performance-based paid search alone accounts for **38.7% of internet advertising media expenditure**, according to [Dentsu's detailed internet advertising analysis](https://www.dentsu.co.jp/en/news/release/2026/0305-011007.html) published on 5 March 2026. If anything, the answer layer strengthens the paid case on commercial terms, because buying queries still produce clicks in a way informational ones no longer do.

Two networks matter:

- **Google Ads** for the widest reach. Given Google's dominance in Japanese search, this is where the volume is.
- **Yahoo! Japan's ad network** to reach an older and more female audience. Its listing has historically skewed that way, which makes it a useful complement when your target segment fits that profile.

Treat the older-and-more-female skew as an indicative pointer from EU-Japan Centre guidance rather than a hard fact for your specific category. It is an older observation, so validate it against current campaign data before you weight budget toward Yahoo! Japan's network. The reliable takeaway is that search ads work well in Japan and that the two networks reach somewhat different audiences.

For how paid search sits within the broader Japanese media mix, including television, print, and out-of-home, see our breakdown of [above-the-line advertising in Japan](/insights/above-the-line-advertising-japan).

## What SEO in Japan Costs

Almost nobody in this market publishes prices, which makes budgeting the hardest part of the planning conversation. Here is what we can put numbers on, with the honesty flags attached.

**The build.** Localising a website properly for Japan, meaning native Japanese copywriting, development work, and Japanese SEO groundwork rather than a translation pass, has run EUR 10,000 to 30,000 in the vendor quotes we have seen. Treat that as a market observation from real quotes, not an audited average. Where you land in the range depends mostly on page count and how much of the content needs to be written rather than adapted.

**The run.** Ongoing Japanese SEO is priced like agency work everywhere: retainers and scoped projects, with the cost driven by native content production. Public reference points are scarce because most agencies quote only after a call, but the review platform Clutch lists minimum project sizes for Tokyo SEO agencies starting between $1,000 and $5,000, with client engagements running well into six figures. If a quote comes in far below that floor, ask hard questions about who is writing the Japanese.

**The timeline.** SEO pays back slowly everywhere, and Japan adds a localisation runway before the first page even goes live. In our experience, six to twelve months from kick-off to meaningful organic traction is a realistic planning horizon for a new Japanese-language presence, and faster results usually come from the long-tail queries described above rather than head terms. Budget owners who need to show something sooner should pair the organic build with the paid search work from the previous section.

SEO is one line in a bigger market-entry budget. For the full picture, including entity setup and first-year marketing, see our breakdown of the [real cost of entering the Japanese market](/insights/real-cost-entering-japanese-market).

## Hiring a Japan SEO Agency as a European Company

Read the English-language "Japan SEO" market for an hour and you will notice two things. Nearly every visible provider is a Tokyo-based boutique. And nearly all of them keep their pricing private. Both points shape how you should buy.

We track this market in our [list of the best Japan SEO agencies for foreign companies](/insights/best-japan-seo-agencies) alongside the wider [guide to marketing agencies for entering Japan](/insights/japan-marketing-agencies-foreign-companies), and the same caveat applies here: the agencies most visible in English search are the ones that are good at English SEO. For an SEO vendor that is a fair signal of competence, but the visible set is a fraction of the field, and visibility does not replace diligence.

Four questions do most of the diligence work:

1. **Who writes the Japanese?** In-house native writers, or outsourced translation of English drafts? A recurring complaint from foreign companies on practitioner forums like r/SEO is machine-translated or translator-written content that Japanese readers spot instantly. Ask to see two or three Japanese articles the team wrote for other clients, and have a native speaker you trust read them.
2. **How do they do keyword research?** Ask them to walk you through a real example across kanji, katakana, and abbreviation variants, like the workflow earlier in this guide. A vendor who starts from your English keyword list and translates it has told you everything you need to know.
3. **Where do links come from?** Link outreach in Japan is genuinely harder than in Europe; Japanese webmasters link out less freely and cold outreach converts poorly. That difficulty pushes some vendors toward cheap link networks. Ask for examples of links they have earned for clients and check the linking sites yourself. Directories and junk TLDs in the samples are a walk-away signal.
4. **How will they report to you?** You are managing this from Europe, across a seven-to-eight-hour time difference. Agree English-language reporting against KPIs you set (rankings for the agreed keyword set, organic sessions, and leads or transactions), monthly at minimum, with access to the analytics rather than screenshots of it. Make sure your contract leaves you owning the content, the site, and every account.

One structural note from our own corridor research: the visible field delivers from inside Japan, which is exactly right for native content and local outreach, and less right for the European side of the work, where your analytics stack, consent setup, and reporting have to satisfy EU rules and an EU head office. However you split the work, make one party accountable for the whole funnel, and if the strategy side should sit in Europe, that is the gap our [Japan SEO service](/japan-seo-agency) covers, with strategy and reporting on the European side and Japanese execution handled through native partners.

## Takeaways for a European Company

Pulling it together, here is how to approach SEO and search in Japan.

**Optimise for Google, because it covers Yahoo! Japan too.** Google leads, and Yahoo! Japan's search has been Google-powered since 2010, so one strong Google SEO programme covers the large majority of Japanese search. Keep an eye on Bing's desktop share if you sell B2B.

**Go mobile-first.** With smartphone ownership at 91.8% of households[^mic-smartphone] and around 107 million internet users[^datareportal-jp], mobile performance and mobile-friendly pages are the baseline for competing at all.

**Localise, do not translate.** Japanese has no spaces between words, mixes four scripts, and drives query patterns that machine translation misses. Run keyword research per script variant, assign one primary variant per page, and put a native reviewer between the tools and the content plan.

**Build for AI Overviews from day one.** They have been live in Japan since August 2024, and in our own 30-query panel an Overview held position 1 on 89% of queries. Definitional passages, sourced numbers, and FAQ blocks earn citations in AI answers on top of their classic ranking value. Grade informational pages on citation, commercial pages on clicks, and split every report by engine and by whether an Overview is present.

**Budget with open eyes.** EUR 10,000 to 30,000 for a proper localised build in the quotes we have seen, agency projects from the low thousands per month, and six to twelve months of runway before organic traction. Pair with paid search if you need earlier proof.

**Buy carefully.** Most providers publish no pricing, so run the four diligence questions: who writes the Japanese, how keywords are researched, where links come from, and how they will report to a European head office.

Get those right and you have covered most of how search works in Japan, without the parallel-universe complexity the market's reputation suggests.

And if search is one piece of a bigger move, see how it fits the wider [marketing in Japan](/insights/marketing-in-japan) channel mix, or our [Japan market entry](/east-asia-market-entry/japan) page for how we approach the rest.

[^statcounter-jp]: Search-engine market share, Japan: [StatCounter GlobalStats](https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/japan), 2026 readings. StatCounter measures share from page views across a large sample of sites; its Japan figures have moved sharply over recent years, so confirm the live numbers before quoting them in a plan.

[^datareportal-jp]: [DataReportal, *Digital 2026: Japan*](https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-japan): internet-user count and national connectivity figures for Japan.

[^mic-smartphone]: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC), *Communications Usage Trend Survey*, 2025: household smartphone-ownership figure.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Google or Yahoo bigger for search in Japan?

Google leads, but by less than most sources claim. StatCounter's June 2026 readings for Japan put Google at 59.0%, Bing at 33.1% and Yahoo! Japan at 6.2%, with everything else under 1% each. Articles asserting Google holds 80% or more are citing 2024 and 2025 figures, and Japan's readings have moved substantially since. Yahoo! Japan's web search has run on Google's search technology since 2010, so ranking on Google still covers Yahoo! Japan's results, but a Google-only plan leaves the Bing share uncovered. Search-engine shares move around, so check the live StatCounter figures before planning with them.
### Can I just translate my existing SEO pages into Japanese?

No. Translation and localisation are different things. Japanese has no spaces between words and mixes four scripts (kanji, hiragana, katakana, and romaji), and Japanese users often search with phrasing that a direct machine translation of your home-market keywords will miss. Proper Japanese SEO starts with native keyword research and native copy, not a translated version of pages written for another market.
### How much does SEO in Japan cost?

Two layers. The build: vendor quotes we have seen for proper Japanese website localisation (native copywriting, development, and Japanese SEO groundwork) run EUR 10,000 to 30,000. The run: most Japanese agencies do not publish retainer pricing, but Clutch-listed Tokyo SEO agencies show minimum project sizes between $1,000 and $5,000, with engagements running well into six figures. Treat the build range as a market observation from quotes, not an audited average, and plan on six to twelve months before organic work pays back.
### Do AI Overviews affect Japanese search results?

Yes, and heavily. Japan was in the first group of six countries to get AI Overviews outside the United States, announced by Google in August 2024. Across a 30-query panel of Silkdrive's own top non-branded queries measured in August 2026, an AI Overview occupied absolute position 1 on 89% of them. On one query we rank organic position 2 and are cited inside the Overview, and still recorded zero clicks across 695 impressions. Ranking well no longer implies receiving traffic.
### Should I invest in SEO in Japan if the AI answer resolves the query anyway?

Yes, but with a changed objective. In our own measurement, every query where we were cited inside the Overview placed us in the live top 8 organically, and no query where we ranked outside the top 15 was cited at all. Ranking is currently the precondition for citation rather than an alternative to it. What changes is the success measure: citation presence and branded-search lift rather than raw click volume on informational terms.
### How do I choose a Japan SEO agency as a foreign company?

Ask four things. Who writes the Japanese content, in-house natives or outsourced translators? How do they research keywords across kanji, hiragana, katakana, and romaji variants? Where do their links come from, and can they show examples? And will they report in English against KPIs you set? A recurring complaint from foreign companies on practitioner forums is machine-translated content that Japanese readers spot instantly, so the writing question matters most.